Artists and producers accuse YouTube and Google of cheapening the music industry

by Nick Webster. Published Thu 02 Apr 2009 13:16

Billy Bragg and ex-Bee Gee Robin Gibb have denounced Google as 'cheapening' the music industry in the recent royalties row between YouTube and PRS for Music.

YouTube began blocking UK access to music videos last month after Google failed to reach a new royalties agreement with PRS for Music, the British body that collects royalties for composers and publishers.

Bragg, Gibb and other artists, including producers Pete Waterman and Mike Chapman, have written to The Times, demanding that Google 'reinstate music on YouTube and pay a fair price for it.'

The letter includes the signatures of over 500 other songwriters and musicians, including Mark Kelly from UK band Marillion, who claims that he received 0.6p in royalties from Google in the past three months, even though his band's music videos had been viewed over 10m times on YouTube.

PRS for Music is asking Google to pay 0.22p every time a song is played on YouTube, but the internet giant refused the price, saying: "The costs are simply prohibitive for us... under
PRS's proposed terms we would lose significant amounts of money with every playback."

In the letter, the group wrote: "Music fans in the UK are confused and angry at Google's stance. We, as songwriters and composers of music, share those concerns. It is not in anyone's best interests to block access to music.

"Fans are denied enjoyment, creators aren't paid and illegal music sites benefit from the resulting displacement of web traffic.

"In 2007 the UK's independent Copyright Tribunal established that a minimum royalty per play was an essential requirement in the licensing of online services.

"Google fails to recognise this and ascribes little value to music - in spite of a huge increase in music usage on YouTube's UK service."





Comments about Artists and producers accuse YouTube and Google of cheapening the music industry

Billy Mays here telling you Quinn Cox that in the UK p = penny and £ = pound. Honestly, I'm ashamed to be an American citizen sometimes.
Billy Mays, USA around 11 months, 1 week ago
It;s easy. YouTube just stops putting ads on the pages that are in dispute. Yeah....
Roy Williams, London around 11 months, 1 week ago
Google/YouTube is not the only game in town. Move on...
Jim, usa around 11 months, 1 week ago
How about .11p? and... its the UK so isn't "p"= Pounds?
Quinn Cox, Tucson, AZ/ San Diego CA around 11 months, 1 week ago
Read it properly Robin....it's 0.22p a play ie a fraction of a penny, not 22p!!!
Dafyd, Sefton around 11 months, 2 weeks ago
Sheer volume would kill Google, financially but yanking the tunes is the opposite extreme. Revenue streams vs access to tunes: what to do?
Robi Polgar, Austin, Texas around 11 months, 2 weeks ago
sorry, robin, but for indie artists like me, youtube has been a boon, drawing people to my website and cdbaby page. the majors are done....
www.joelivoti.com, usa around 11 months, 2 weeks ago
22p a play! That's nothing short of ransom from the PRS. Whilst musicians do have a right they need to be realistic.
Robin Keyes, Thornton around 11 months, 2 weeks ago


Post a comment






Alert me of replies

You have characters left


 









Latest Business

Mobex Northwest

Mobex Northwest
(Mon 15/03)












Powered by Click Creative
© All Rights Reserved.